Regional, multi-siteOrganizational
PM Step 1 — TPM Pillar
PM Step 1 turned from a slide into a scored, site-owned audit
01 — Results
80%
Audit pass threshold
3
Sub-pillars tracked
Site-owned
Accountability model
| Metric | Before | After | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Undefined per site | Scored audit instrument | 80% pass bar |
| Sub-pillars tracked | None rolled up | Equipment eval, storeroom, PM | 3 workstreams |
| Accountability | Central grading | Site-owned scores | Ownership moved |
| Failure data | Logged, unused | Feeds the capital plan | Funded roadmap |
02 — Challenge
Preventive maintenance maturity varied by site with no common definition of what 'done' looked like for Step 1 of the PM pillar.
Central grading does not change behavior. Sites needed to own their own score and see failure data turn into funded work.
03 — My role
Pillar lead and auditor
Timeline: Ongoing
04 — Scope
- Step 1 score guide and audit instrument with an 80% pass threshold
- Progress tracker rolling up equipment evaluation, storeroom management and preventive maintenance workstreams
- Site-level pillar leaders accountable for their own scores rather than a central team grading from afar
- Failure and criticality data feeding the capital plan, so PM findings become funded projects
05 — Execution
- Step 1 score guide and audit instrument built with an 80% pass threshold
- Progress tracker rolling up equipment evaluation, storeroom management and preventive maintenance workstreams
- Site-level pillar leaders made accountable for their own scores
- Failure and criticality data routed into the capital plan so PM findings become funded projects
06 — Systems & technology
- TPM
- PM pillar
- CMMS
- Reliability
07 — Artifacts & evidence
- PM Step 1 progress tracker rolling up all three workstreams by site
- Audit scores held against the 80% threshold
08 — Key takeaways
The audit only stuck once findings had a funding path. Scores without capital become paperwork.